Preface
This is not a theory.
Not a system.
It is a return—
to collapse, tension, and the unfinished.
Recursive Collapse names a process:
of undoing,
of re-entering what resists closure.
There is no argument to follow.
No clarity to master.
Read it in fragments.
Read it again.
Let it shift.
That is the method.
How to Read Recursive Collapse
You do not begin this work.
You enter it.
Recursive Collapse is not a theory to follow.
Not a system to adopt.
Not a lens to see through.
It is a wound that stays open.
A site of return where resolution once stood.
A refusal to finalize what the world insists must be named.
This is not philosophy in the academic sense.
It offers no clean axioms.
No safe conclusions.
It begins, always, in the middle—
with contradiction, implication, presence.
With the aftermath of meaning,
and the debris of form.
It spirals through ethics, art, institutions, and the fractured self—
not to define them,
but to re-enter their collapse.
To read this is to be read by it.
You will not find coherence.
You will find recurrence.
Tension. Silence.
Gestures that echo.
Terms that undo themselves.
Essays that contradict each other—
and remain faithful in that contradiction.
Each page is a threshold.
An invitation to return—
not to what was,
but to what still reverberates.
This is a corpus of fragments.
A recursive terrain.
It spans recursive ethics, liminal abstraction, institutional infection, and threshold politics.
But none of these are categories.
They are doors left ajar.
What enters with you is not clarity—
but fidelity.
Fidelity to collapse.
To harm.
To what was touched.
To what never closed.
There is no order of reading.
No center to grasp.
Only fractures.
Only returns.
If the text shifts when you revisit it,
that is not failure.
That is the method.
Recursive Collapse does not ask for belief.
It asks for presence.
Your presence.
You are not here to master this work.
You are here to implicate yourself in it.
Welcome—
not to a beginning,
but to the echo
of what refuses to end.
“Recursive Collapse names a process:
of undoing,
of re-entering what resists closure.”
I’m so delighted to read this sentence Clement. You’re describing in one sentence the process that has guided me in photography since I began 60+ years ago. I’m both an artist and a philosopher myself. But I’ve never run into such a clear statement of what drives my creative process than this sentence . God bless you.
This is brilliant!